« "Analysis:" AP-Speak for "Hagiography" | Main | MCLU: Sex Offenders Deserve Privacy, or Something »

April 23, 2009

If Baghdad Bob Wrote for "E&P"

The results would probably look something like this column - "They will surrender, it is they who will surrender!"

NEW YORK Enough already. Partial facts and misinformation about newspapers are distorting the view for everyone, including readers and advertisers.

Let's set the record straight: Newspapers still enjoy considerable readership and deliver strong results for advertisers. More Americans read printed newspapers than watch the Super Bowl. More Americans read printed newspapers than own dogs. Newspapers and their Web sites reach a larger audience than ever before.

The crisis facing newspapers is not an audience problem. It is a revenue problem.

Let's see...what do newspapers base their advertising rates on? What do potential advertisers look for when trying to figure out how to spend their money? What is the connection between revenue and audience? Yeah, that's a real stumper she's got there.

Barrett's true Baghdad Bob-ishness is revealed in her desperate comparisons. Number of daily newspapers? 1,422. Number of Super Bowls? One, once a year for five hours or so. A more relevant comparison would be number of newspaper readers versus...say...number of hits per day on the Drudge Report. Something tells me that comparison would not work as well for Barrett.

Not content to simply refuse one acknowledgment of reality, Barrett doubles down:

There is no shortage of other theories on why newspapers are hurting. Most come from those without direct responsibility for the financial health of a newspaper. Some popular explanations:

1.) Newspapers are too liberal and drive off readers as a result.
2.) Newspaper publishers are slow to embrace new technology.
3.) Newspapers are losing readers to the Internet.

As my father used to say, they don’t know what they don’t know. In reality, none of these theories is responsible for newspapers' woes.

In other words, no, newspapers aren't losing readers because of liberalism, technology issues or the internet! Why not? Shut up, that's why not. Let's examine each of those issues separately.

1.) Newspapers are too liberal and drive off readers as a result.

I'll let Vanderleun handle this one. Short answer? It's hard to make money in a highly competitive market when you alienate half your audience on a daily basis. Example? This headline, from my hometown paper.

2.) Newspaper publishers are slow to embrace new technology.

Part myth, part truth. Newspapers did jump onto the internet pretty quickly. The problem was that they simply dropped their printed content onto the internet, and then either put those stories behind irritating registration walls (I'm looking at you Washington Post) or tried to charge for it. Not exactly the best strategies when dealing with a medium known for providing content that's both free and accessible. The best example of a newspaper that understood the internet was the Wall St. Journal. They provided their content online, but also provided significant value-added features.

3.) Newspapers are losing readers to the Internet.

This one is undeniable. Of course print newspapers are losing readers to the internet. In an age when news is broken, analyzed and forgotten in the time it takes to post it in HTML or talk about it on cable, the idea of 'breaking' news on paper hours after it has been thoroughly dissected by the networks and the blogs is ridiculous. More often than not, the headline on the front page of most newspapers is always old news.

What's killing newspapers is pretty simple - they are a product of the industrial age. Every day, a newspaper takes a huge staff, enormous machines and a lot of money to produce. I think the future of newspapers is local. By the time our local paper runs national news headlines, the news in question has already been reported by cable news and digested, analyzed and in some cases deconstructed by blogs and online news outlets. Local news, however, has not.

The newspapers that understand that reality will survive. Those that do not, will not.

Cross-posted at the Greenroom.

Posted by slublog at April 23, 2009 09:35 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.slublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4154

Comments

More Americans read printed newspapers than own dogs.

That doesn't mean all people who own dogs actually read the paper. After all, they need something to use when they pick up their dogs shit, so Dogs ADD to the revenue stream for newspapers, cuz who isn't gonna get a 25cent daily, when latex gloves are so expensive, and plastic bags aren't biodegradeable.

Posted by: Wickedpinto at April 25, 2009 10:51 PM

Barrett’s whining sounds a lot like a press release from Obambi’s children – ignore the facts, we’re #1. Slu’s point about alienating half your audience is true enough – in fact, it goes farther. While many liberals are misguided, they are also relatively honest – and the constant lying, fabricating facts, misquoting and spin have caused many on the left to distrust their own information sources.

Not everyone who watches FOX News or reads right-wing blogs is a retired GI looking for a quick fix. Newspapers and legacy networks are committing suicide one head-shaking whopper at a time. One of the few glimmers of hope for the right is that by 2012 there will be fewer members of the traditional MSM left in business to cause any worry.

Now if the right can come up with a viable candidate who isn’t a lame ass like McLoser.

Posted by: Murph at April 26, 2009 12:16 PM

small chance, hopefully the rest of the country won't accept this asshole. and try and remember objects before we'll consider giving up our Constitutional rights, aka fuck you our recent Mr. President.

Posted by: Anonymous at April 26, 2009 11:06 PM

This is the best blog I've ever seen in my life! I really appreciate you taking the time out of your busy day to share your this with everyone.

Posted by: link building at November 1, 2010 11:11 AM

Christian Louboutin shoes Replica come to you at a very affordable price and the promise of the grace your style statement for years. These shoes are incredible, created especially for tourist-class women buy shoes original brand is a distant dream. Now you can your wishes in a style that is very helpful Best Replica Handbags retail price Replica Pro to meet and is the proud owner of Christian Louboutin shoes replica dito. The term Same Replicas think we see that the shoes you buy from these shops, look, feel, and as authentic as their original counterparts. So, you have absolutely no problem because they occur in a high profile event.

Posted by: Best Replica Handbags at November 5, 2010 04:28 AM

Many women enjoy their Designer Replica Handbags From China carries with them wherever they go. Since this is a fashion that a woman should be, there are many manufacturers of bags that have other ideas about how this trade to public access. For many models available, so you can see, you will surely

Posted by: Designer Replica Handbags From China at November 11, 2010 07:14 AM

Your Louis Vuitton Replica Handbags are long term investment, with the right care, which will serve for many years.

Posted by: Louis Vuitton Replica Handbags at November 15, 2010 08:51 PM

Amazing freakin blog here. I almost cried while reading it!

Posted by: Gambling Addiction at November 29, 2010 04:20 PM

I love the way you write and also the theme on your blog. Did you code this yourself or was it done by a professional? I'm very very impressed.

Posted by: Stop Gambling at November 29, 2010 09:26 PM

I’d have to bury the hatchet with you on this. Which is not something I usually do! I love reading a post that will make people think. Also, thanks for allowing me to speak my mind!

Posted by: Qiana Tin at December 6, 2010 08:51 AM

Hey how are you doing? I just wanted to stop by and say that it's been a pleasure reading your blog. I have bookmarked your website so that I can come back & read more in the future as well. plz do keep up the quality writing

Posted by: Backlinks at December 6, 2010 10:24 AM

Pretty necklaces sweet hearts! I will show to my daughter tomorrow, she will be excited. I would like to know make them. Thanks for the post.

Posted by: necklace at December 15, 2010 05:12 AM

How inspiring, I just love this what a fabulous idea, you do have the most lovely posts.

Posted by: Thomas Sabo Charms at December 17, 2010 05:20 AM

Really wonderful web site!

Posted by: Buy Ugg Boot at December 30, 2010 10:28 AM

Hey, check this out. Do you need underwear ? You got luck. I'm inviting you to my site about bielizna

Posted by: Bielizna at January 20, 2011 01:38 PM

Keep focusing on your blog. I love how we can all express our feelings. This is an extremely great blog here :)

Posted by: Photocopier at January 27, 2011 03:38 AM

Taking the time to ask about the local market could also help women with many cost effective solutions. There are designer brands on the market known for quality.

Posted by: Louis Vuitton Handbags at January 31, 2011 11:08 PM

I needed to write you the very little note in order to thank you over again over the fantastic solutions you have featured at this time. It was certainly pretty open-handed of you to grant without restraint exactly what numerous people would have offered for an e-book to get some dough for themselves, even more so since you could have tried it if you ever desired. Those creative ideas as well acted as the fantastic way to comprehend other people online have a similar desire just like my personal own to see lots more in regard to this issue. I am sure there are thousands of more enjoyable sessions in the future for those who view your website.

Posted by: torpedo gratuito claro at March 8, 2011 10:51 PM

Women all over the world loves brands. You can not get enough done brand Prada cheap fake designer Louis Vuitton handbags , shoes and clothes in the closets. Although a woman's toilet is full of fashionable clothes that have the greatest need.

Posted by: Louis Vuitton Handbags at March 12, 2011 09:56 PM