« Our Out-of-Touch Congress | Main | Collins' Brave Stand »
June 27, 2007
Stranger in a Strange Land, Part 3
This is part three of the series. Part one and part two are available below.
"Fire!"
Okay, squeeeeze the trigger...squee...BANG!
The first shot I fired from a semiautomatic Browning .22 was terrible. The instructor had pieces of letter-sized paper tacked to the wall of the range that we used for an aiming point for our first five shots. Mine was low and to the left.
The next was high and to the right. The third ended up between the first and second. By the time I'd finished firing all five shots, I had basically re-created the Big Dipper with bullet holes.
It was at this point that I began to hope we weren't being graded on performance. When I was in high school ROTC, I was a good shot with the M-16 and came a couple of points from qualifying as a sharpshooter. Age and lack of practice had taken their toll, it seems.
The instructor noted that despite my best efforts, I had too much finger on the trigger and was pulling it, not squeezing. Plus, I think I was anticipating the recoil a bit too much and starting to cringe before the shot was fired. Turns out that doesn't really improve one's aim.
As you can see from the target paper, I didn't have much luck correcting my issues on the first ten shots. Well, okay...I fired ten rounds. Eight hit the target.
Next ten. I told myself to calm down. There was no hurry. Just squeeze off the shots slowly. On the second set, I hit the target nine times and the shots were slightly closer together.
And I mean "slightly" in the broadest sense possible. The other guys on the range with me were shooting much better. They weren't getting the shots in the black, but their groupings were pretty tight.
Still, it was progress. Now, on to the revolvers - a Smith and Wesson .22. Heavier, but oddly enough, really fun to shoot, after I suppressed my desire to pull back and release the hammer like I'd seen in Westerns. Not sure if that really works, but it sure looks cool.
An added bonus to the revolvers was that I wouldn't keep getting hit by hot brass fired from the semi-auto to my left. And when I say hot, I mean hot. Good thing the instructor told us to wear long sleeved shirts.
I was a little nervous about the revolvers, but quickly discovered that the time it took to pull back the hammer on a single-action was a good chance to breathe, calm down and improve my shots.
And it worked, kind of. There are a few strays in this group, but not as many as before. And the revolver just felt solid in my hand.
The instructor pinned up the last set of targets. This time, I took my time, did the breathing and followed through with the trigger squeeze.
The results?

Turned out to be the tightest grouping of the night in the black.
Two shots went a little wild, but not too bad. I was pleased, considering I've only fired two shots on a pistol in my life before this evening. Having no bad habits to un-learn really made it easier, I think.
When we went to retrieve the targets, the instructor did an exaggerated double-take, then grinned. That was all the feedback I needed.
"Take this home and hang it on your refrigerator," he said. I agreed that would be a good idea, after I was done showing it off.
After the fun part, we went back to the tables, took a test and then were presented with our certificates. According to the National Rifle Association, the guy who once thought that organization was a quaint anachronism has successfully completed the NRA Basic Pistol Course. And I have the badge to show for it.
Honestly, though, I'm not sure what to do with the badge. I don't have a shooting jacket or anything, and it would look funny on a suit coat. A question for another day.
Overall, the experience was an extremely positive one. I had a lot of fun, learned quite a bit and now can understand basic weapons lingo. Recently, Dr. Helen wrote the following at Pajamas Media.:
Understand and be able to use a basic handgun. Many people will oppose me on this one; they are pacifists, uninterested in guns, scared of guns, whatever. Yet hear me out. Even if you hate guns, knowing the basics of how handguns work (and you might have to shoot one to find out) will save you from looking like a buffoon if you work as a politician, journalist or are just debating the merits of gun ownership and want to at least give the appearance of having some knowledge of your subject. Debating about guns without understanding the basics of how they work is like engaging in magical thinking about the boogey man—but then, many people do this. And a gun is a tool, so it is important to know how the darn thing works just in case you are put in a position where you have to handle one at some point in your life.This is from a column about what adults should be able to do. I think she's right.
I don't know if I'm ever going to actually own a gun, and it's highly doubtful I'll ever be in a situation where the use of one will be necessary. However, what I've learned over the past three days is not just a new set of skills and knowledge of firearms.
I've also learned that I enjoy target shooting. The actual shooting is almost incidental to the calm and discipline one has to assume before squeezing the trigger and trying for a perfect shot. Most importantly, though, I learned that everything the media tries to tell you about legal gun owners is wrong.
These folks are concerned about safety. Extremely concerned. They know that politicians, the media and the public are constantly watching their every move, waiting for a mistake and they take that responsibility seriously. They, more than anyone, know this is more than about plinking cans or playing Rambo. This is a right handed down to us by men who thought we should be entrusted with it.
In taking this class, I saw an instructor who constantly encouraged his class to be safe, and met citizens who enjoy firearms and target shooting, but also take the Second Amendment seriously, and wanted to make sure they exercised the rights granted to them responsibly.
And seeing that was even cooler than the experience of putting rounds into a target.
Posted by slublog at June 27, 2007 11:09 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.slublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3205
Comments
Congrats, Slub.
Posted by: geoff at June 28, 2007 05:34 AM
I never thought "Browning .22..." and "...anticipating the recoil a bit too much..." could be put in the same paragraph. :) Seriously though, great series.
Posted by: downfleeced at June 28, 2007 10:06 AM
Slu,
I gave you a bit of shit the other day in a good natured fashion. You took it as intended.
And you did great. A group like that is nothing to scoff at in the least. The nice part about target shooting is that you can take any object, place it out as far as would be equal to to the size of the black kabove, and you know you could hit it (up to about 50 yards---then drop starts really mattering).
So when you look at that on your fridge, know that your sharpshooting days aren't over. And also remember that they make AR-15 pistols, now too.
And oooohh-eee are those scary looking.
Good on ya, mate.
Posted by: malphonse at June 28, 2007 01:59 PM
Good job!
Posted by: MikeX at June 28, 2007 05:07 PM
Still awesome!
highly doubtful I'll ever be in a situation
You know what they say. A gun is a thing you hope you never need, but when you do need one, you need it really really badly.
That's funny about the hot brass. I was at the range one day and a hot casing from a 9mm flew up and down into the front of the shirt of a (pretty) woman, who did one excited owwie dance and just about ripped her shirt off to get it out of there.
We politely stopped shooting to observe and make sure she was ok.
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 28, 2007 05:08 PM
Well, one has to be polite...
Posted by: Slublog at June 28, 2007 06:01 PM
Any time I get them all on the paper, I consider it a victory. Once you spang one off the clip holding the target, you'll know what I mean.
I love revolvers. They're simple and reliable.
Posted by: S. Weasel at June 28, 2007 06:14 PM
Congrats! Now it's time to make the transition from subject to citizen and buy one. You might want to start with a revolver in .357 mag- you can shoot milder (and cheaper) .38 special rounds through it for target practice. Ruger makes some decent double action revolvers that are pretty reasonably priced.
Posted by: Hollowpoint at June 28, 2007 06:35 PM
Nice going Slu.
Posted by: Pupster at June 29, 2007 02:56 PM
I remember Kim DuToit saying "a revolver is like a fork, you pick it up and it works". Something to be said for that.
I have a couple of revolvers and 4 semiautos.
and a commie SKS! RRRRAHR
Posted by: Dave in Texas at June 29, 2007 03:18 PM
I was a good shot with the M-16 and came a couple of points from qualifying as a sharpshooter. Age and lack of practice had taken their toll, it seems.
Guy in was in the service with unq'd 3 times, one time while I was on the range with him, while firing the 16, but he could shoot the hell out of a pistol.
It's a different form of shooting, with a rifle, you play with the rifle to suit you making the rifle do the work, with a pistol it's all on you.
Posted by: Wickedpinto at June 30, 2007 07:41 PM
Great series. I really liked your insights on the kind of people that were in your class. Whenever I take a newbie to the range I always stress the responsiblity involved in owning and operating a firearm, and while some may roll their eyes at my nagging, they stop soon after the ol' .223 hollowpoint-through-the-water-jug demonstration.
Posted by: Brass at July 1, 2007 03:18 PM
Good series, and you're right. It's all about "discipline". Something Sara Brady and her group don't want to mention. It doesn't fit the drooling, glassy eyed mantra they try to portray.
Posted by: GarandFan at April 15, 2009 11:09 AM
