« A Normal Stone Film? | Main | Your Tax Dollars at Work? »
February 14, 2006
Milbank's Antics
Parts of the conservative blogosphere are annoyed with Washington Post reporter Dana Milbank for this:
Malkin says this is a "display of less-than-objective journalism" on Milbank's part. I say it's simply kind of funny. Milbank seems to be taking the story about as seriously as it deserves to be taken, which is to say not at all. Cheney's accident was just that - and the posturing of blowhards like David Gregory (full disclosure: I think Gregory is a nitwit and a jerk) about the 'coverup' is just nonsense. This is an odd story, but hardly a scandal.
Milbank was just being a doofus. Let's concentrate on his bad reporting, not his on-screen antics.
UPDATE - Eugene Robinson shows that not everyone at the Washington Post shares Milbank's (admittedly weird) sense of humor. It's red meat for the Kos Kids.
Posted by slublog at February 14, 2006 08:03 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.slublog.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2132
Comments
I love the expression. Everyone needs to express there own opinion and feel free to hear others. Keep it up :)
Posted by: Backlinks at November 30, 2010 03:13 AM
Zune and iPod: Most people compare the Zune to the Touch, but after seeing how slim and surprisingly small and light it is, I consider it to be a rather unique hybrid that combines qualities of both the Touch and the Nano. It's very colorful and lovely OLED screen is slightly smaller than the touch screen, but the player itself feels quite a bit smaller and lighter. It weighs about 2/3 as much, and is noticeably smaller in width and height, while being just a hair thicker.
Posted by: Issac Maez at December 7, 2010 12:23 AM
Hi there, your blog’s design is simple and clean and i like it. Your blog posts are superb. Please keep them coming. Greets!
Posted by: Car Games at February 7, 2011 02:51 PM
Walters told her that a lot has been written in the press about whether Stevenson is Black or White.
Posted by: Prudence Agnor at February 11, 2011 04:33 AM
Hands down, Apple's app store wins by a mile. It's a huge selection of all sorts of apps vs a rather sad selection of a handful for Zune. Microsoft has plans, especially in the realm of games, but I'm not sure I'd want to bet on the future if this aspect is important to you. The iPod is a much better choice in that case.
Posted by: Sohbet at March 1, 2011 04:46 AM
If you're still on the fence: grab your favorite earphones, head down to a Best Buy and ask to plug them into a Zune then an iPod and see which one sounds better to you, and which interface makes you smile more. Then you'll know which is right for you.
Posted by: Sohbet at March 1, 2011 06:19 AM
Apple now has Rhapsody as an app, which is a great start, but it is currently hampered by the inability to store locally on your iPod, and has a dismal 64kbps bit rate. If this changes, then it will somewhat negate this advantage for the Zune, but the 10 songs per month will still be a big plus in Zune Pass' favor.
Posted by: chat at March 4, 2011 03:02 AM